Trump allies have been eager to see the report, arguing that Durham would make it clear what the former president has been saying all along - that his campaign did nothing wrong but that the Obama administration was using the power of the federal government to try to influence the 2016 election. This report reinforces the importance of ensuring the FBI continues to do its work with the rigor, objectivity, and professionalism the American people deserve and rightly expect.”ĭurham lost the only two prosecutions he brought to court. But the report released Monday appeared to be an appeal to the court of public opinion - an argument that Trump was treated unfairly by FBI officials who were too quick to unleash the bureau’s investigative powers. "Had those reforms been in place in 2016, the missteps identified in the report could have been prevented. “The conduct in 20 that Special Counsel Durham examined was the reason that current FBI leadership already implemented dozens of corrective actions, which have now been in place for some time," the statement said. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin at their summit in Helsinki on July 16, 2018. The FBI, in response to the report, indicated that the missteps identified by Durham have already been addressed. “Senior FBI personnel displayed a serious lack of analytical rigor toward the information they received, especially information received from politically affiliated persons or entities.” Prosecutors said the FBI has been investigating with assistance from the Nassau County district attorney’s office and the IRS.“The Department and the FBI failed to uphold their important mission of strict fidelity to law,” the conclusion section of Durham’s report says. If he is convicted, Santos could face up to 20 years in prison for “the top counts,” the Justice Department said, without specifying which counts those were. George Santos, R-N.Y., speaks to the media outside the federal courthouse in Central Islip, N.Y., on Wednesday. In March, the House Ethics Committee opened an investigation that it said would determine whether Santos “engaged in unlawful activity with respect to his 2022 congressional campaign failed to properly disclose required information on statements filed with the House violated federal conflict of interest laws in connection with his role in a firm providing fiduciary services and/or engaged in sexual misconduct towards an individual seeking employment in his congressional office.” Rep. "These assertions were false: Santos had not received from the Devolder Organization LLC the reported amounts of salary or dividends and did not maintain checking or savings accounts with deposits in the reported amounts," the Justice Department said. For his campaign last year, Santos also allegedly overstated his income and assets in financial disclosure documents, including claiming he received a $750,000 salary from his Florida-based company, the Devolder Organization LLC, as well as dividends. During his first campaign, in May 2020, Santos allegedly overstated his income and failed to disclose the salary he received from the investment firm, according to the indictment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |